By Diana Hsieh
Ari Armstrong and I published an op-ed on Colorado's Amendment 62 (personhood for zygotes) and Amendment 63 (health care choice) in Friday's Denver Daily News: A62, A63 reveal ideological rifts.
Our article observes that many groups either oppose or endorse both Amendments 62 and 63. Yet these measures are based on opposite political premises. Amendment 62 (personhood) violates rights, while Amendment 63 (health care choice) protects them. The article then explains how both the entitlement left and religious right advocate a false view of rights. And it sketches a secular view of rights whereby each person is left free to act by his own judgment and for his own life and happiness.
Go read the whole thing!
For more information on Amendment 62, see Ari Armstrong's and my policy paper: The 'Personhood' Movement Is Anti-Life: Why It Matters that Rights Begin at Birth, Not Conception.
For more information on Amendment 63, visit the Independence Institute and Patient Power Now.
Also, Paul has been busy advocating free market medicine via FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine. Here's his two most recent endeavors:
- The October 23, 2010 Denver Post published his op-ed "The 'Right To Health Care Choice'is right for Colorado". (That's also about Amendment 63.)
- Capitalism Magazine just posted "A Medical Doctor Explains the Pros and Cons of ObamaCare: An Interview with Dr. Paul Hsieh" by Joshua Lipana.